disregard that last post

it means about as little as this one will.

i'm supposed to be writing a supported opinion paper on the development of mesopotamia. to be honest, i really don't have any opinion on mesopotamia at all, nevermind a supported one. that's probably why they supply opinions for you:
1. mesopotamian societies developed many aspects of western civilization that we take for granted today.
2. geographic influences were integral to the succesful development of mesopotamia.
3. the single most important factor in spurring social change is warfare.
the one i agree with the most is number three, really, but i have no facts to support it so i went with number two.
i don't even know what it means to say "geographical influences".

i wish you were supplied with opinions in more areas of life.
i wish i didn't have to write 500-600 words right now.

hell, i can do it easily here, can't i? i can type forever and ever and never get tired.
okay, okay, i'm tired.

why should opinions have to be supported with facts? opinions are opinions for a reason: they have nothing to do with facts.
next thing you know you'll have to support your feelings with facts. i'll be screwed, i can't even figure out what my feelings are.

then again, i'll probably have them supplied for me:
1. i love you.
2. i hate you.
3. do me.

does number three even count as a feeling?
support your arguments with FACTS.